DOE proposes $494.7 million for Yucca Mountain
By
STEVE TETREAULT and TONY BATT
Las Vegas Review-Journal
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
February 05, 2008
WASHINGTON -- The Department of Energy proposed a $494.7 million
budget for Yucca Mountain on Monday, and braced for another
year of defending the project against critics in Congress.
The budget is almost the same amount that DOE requested last
year to continue work on the nuclear waste repository it wants
to build in Nevada. It was less than half of the $1.2 billion
that Yucca project managers once told lawmakers would be necessary
to keep the project on a preferred schedule.
After a series of years in which Congress has slashed Yucca
spending, officials on Monday characterized their fiscal 2009
request as a realistic one.
"We intend to move ahead," Energy Secretary Samuel
Bodman said at a briefing on the final DOE budget of the Bush
administration. The budget "demonstrates, we believe, our
commitment to this project."
Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he was resharpening his ax for
the repository, several months after engineering a deep cut
that prompted several hundred job layoffs and schedule delays
that are still being calculated.
"Despite the fact Congress cut his proposal by $108 million
last year, President Bush requested $495 million again this
year," Reid said. "Clearly, he will not get that funding."
"On Yucca Mountain, the president's budget request will
not be met," added Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev.
DOE has all but officially written off a planned June deadline
to apply for a repository construction license. Bodman said
Monday the license application now would be completed sometime
in 2008.
Previously DOE's "best-case" outlook had Yucca Mountain
open and accepting nuclear waste by 2017. A new schedule could
push that back by five years or more, and some experts say the
opening date could be even further in the future, if ever.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said support in Congress will
erode the longer the repository is delayed.
"The chance that Yucca Mountain will open before 2020 fades
like a Nevada sunset," Berkley said. "President Bush
is dreaming if he thinks Congress is going to waste another
$495 million dollars on his plan to turn Nevada into a nuclear
waste dump."
In addition, the 2009 budget for the Nevada Test Site would
be cut by almost $27 million.
The Department of Energy is seeking $332.8 million for the test
site, a 7.49 percent decrease from what Congress approved for
this year.
At the same time, the 2009 budget for the department's site
office in North Las Vegas would increase about 10.65 percent
from this year.
The Nevada Site Office, which oversees a range of programs at
the desert installation, would receive $190.5 million in 2009.
Thomas D'Agostino, administrator of the National Nuclear Security
Administration which oversees the test site, said he does not
know if the budget request would affect jobs.
"We expect a lot more happening at Nevada at the Device
Assembly Facility," D'Agostino said.
The Device Assembly Facility, or DAF, is a 100,000-square-foot
bunker 85 miles northwest of Las Vegas on the test site.
The facility was originally designed in the mid-1980s to assemble
nuclear test devices before they were moved underground for
detonation.
DAF is currently used to assemble subcritical or non-nuclear
experiments that comply with the U.S. moratorium on nuclear
testing, which began in 1992.
For security reasons, nuclear criticality machines as well as
plutonium and highly enriched uranium have been transferred
from Los Alamos National Laboratory to DAF, which is considered
one of the most secure facilities in the world.
As for environmental cleanup of the test site, the Energy Department
wants to slash last year's funding by 18.3 percent, to $65.7
million from $80.4 million.
The savings would be used to continue disposing of transuranic
waste fat the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, about 20 miles east
of Carlsbad, N.M. Transuranic waste is radioactive material
that results from the research and production of nuclear weapons.